Asked by:
"All disks holding extents for a given volume must have the same sector size, and the sector size must be valid." for two 512b-sector disks

Question
-
Hello everyone
The current setup: I have two 1TB disks, both with 512 byte sectors (no AF, 512e, ...). Disk 1 contains two partitions (System Reserved and C:) and lots of free space, disk 0 was emptied completely (DISKPART CLEAN) and is now an empty, initialized, dynamic disk:
What works:
- Creating a new mirrored (or spanned, or striped) partition on disk 0 and 1, when using disk 0's context menu.
What doesn't work:
- Creating a new mirrored (or spanned, or striped) partition on disk 0 and 1, when using disk 1's context menu. The relevant context menu items are all grayed out.
- Adding a mirror on disk 0 for an existing partition on disk 1. The error message is "All disks holding extents for a given volume must have the same sector size, and the sector size must be valid."
There are reports of similar problems all over this and other forums. Usually the OP tries to mix 512 & 4k sector disks, which isn't the case here.
Cheers,
SimonFriday, October 24, 2014 10:38 PM
All replies
-
Hi Simon,
I have done a test on my Windows Server 2008 R2 and have a same issue with you. The issue is not occurred on Windows Server 2012.
Please refer to the thread below to troubleshoot the issue:
Error - All disks holding extents for a given volume must have the same sector size, and the sector size must be valid.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/dc113f43-61d9-4929-afe9-fe3536ea937d/error-all-disks-holding-extents-for-a-given-volume-must-have-the-same-sector-size-and-the-sector?forum=winserverfiles
Best Regards,
MandyTuesday, October 28, 2014 8:26 AM -
Hi Mandy
Thanks for your reply.
Can you reproduce the issue with the preview?
I'm not sure how the troubleshooting thread applies here:
- First, that thread also states that people think this behavior is a bug. So maybe it actually is something MSFT engineers should look into?
- The mirroring works in principle. I CAN CREATE MIRRORED PARTITIONS *if* I create a new one, starting from disk 0. So it CANNOT be an alignment/sector size issue. Right?
Cheers,
SimonTuesday, October 28, 2014 1:03 PM -
I just reinstalled the preview, onto disk 0. Now I have the same problem, but in the opposite direction:
- Creating mirrored volumes, starting form disk 1, works.
- Adding mirrors to volumes on disk 0, or creating volumes, starting from disk 0, does not work.
This looks really buggy.
Simon
Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM -
Hi Simon,
I have done a test on the preview and the issue doesn’t reproduce on the preview. Based on my research, I found that the issue could due to the "Bytes Per Physical Sector". On my Windows Server 2008 R2 the "Bytes Per Physical Sector" of drives display "Not Supported". Please run the command "fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo drive_letter" to check if the "Bytes Per Physical Sector" mismatch.
You could try to use different disks to test if the issue is due to disk architecture. For a workaround, you could backup the data, format both disks and then try to create a mirror using empty disks.
For more detailed information, please refer to the thread below:
Error Adding Mirror to Boot Volume - Sector Size?
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-hardware/error-adding-mirror-to-boot-volume-sector-size/f5729d4c-629b-4978-9de4-faae382060c4?page=3
Best Regards,
MandyThursday, November 6, 2014 6:21 AM -
Hi Mandy
It feels as if you didn't read the OP. As the title already states, both disks are 512b-sector disks. And as you can see clearly in the second screenshot, creating mirrored partitions *IS* possible. So that's not it.
Cheers,
SimonThursday, November 6, 2014 11:04 AM