Only question threads (not discussion threads) can have answers. You have to be an OP/Asker, Answerer (Editor), Moderator, Administrator, or Owner to mark and unmark an answer. The OP (Original Poster) cannot propose answers. Anybody other than the OP can propose an answer. More than one post can be the answer to a thread. Answering questions is the most important task in a forum. If a forum has a high rate of answered questions, it encourages people to ask. If questions are being marked as answered, then it encourages people to answer questions (for the satisfaction, for Recognition Points, for the stats, and marks toward Achievement medals). If helpful responses receive votes as being helpful, then the community is more likely to answer with helpful responses. That is why people might be made Moderators or Answerers. Answering is much more needed than other moderating tasks. See The Different Roles in MSDN and TechNet Forums. When a thread contains a post that is the correct answer, moderators need to ensure that the correct post is marked as the answer. The best possible scenario is the following:
1. The original poster (OP) asks a question
2. A community member responds to the post with an answer
3. The original poster marks the response (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Original Poster Marking an Answer
Personal request: If you see any process or other body of detailed, helpful information that you or someone else writes that you think deserves to be written out in a Library somewhere, then please use the information to create a new TechNet Wiki article (www.technet.com/wiki). That way we can leverage the knowledge into a Library/Help-like wiki format and give back to the community in another way that’s super helpful. For example, we created this tag for tracking all Wiki articles that originated from forums: “From Forum” tag on TechNet Wiki.
This article is also available in the following languages:
Back to Moderating Microsoft Forums.
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 33. Comment: Corrected #6
Bruno Lewin - MSFT edited Revision 32. Comment: Adding Link to Spanish version
Karl Mitschke edited Revision 27. Comment: Modified figure number
Richard Mueller edited Revision 26. Comment: Made "Other Languages" a header line, so it shows in the TOC
yottun8 edited Revision 20. Comment: Added ja-JP version.
Zoltán Horváth edited Revision 19. Comment: Replaced the first sentence, just not to start a page with "back to". Tagging.
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 17. Comment: White space issues
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 15. Comment: Updated the whole article with much more details.
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 14. Comment: Updated a header. Added tags.
Richard Mueller edited Revision 12. Comment: Added tags
Naomi N edited Revision 2. Comment: minor typo fix
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 4. Comment: Adding more best practices around marking and proposing answers.
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 9. Comment: Added note about voting as helpful
Yagmoth555 edited Revision 11. Comment: added a link to a new translation, fr-FR
Featured on the home page of TechNet Wiki!
The policy, as outlined here, is backfiring in my case. I posted two questions and had the same forum troll provide unhelpful answers in both cases, typically rewording information from my question or failing to provide anything not already in books online. While I was waiting (only a couple of days) for better answers, the moderator jumps in and marks "answered" to the question. The net result is my questions were not answered and I can't put them back out for better answers by more knowledgeable forum participants.
Neil, I would suggest that you unmark the answer. No moderator should ever by offended by this. As the question asker you can do this (and should if it does not answer your question). Then reply with an explanation or further details on your question (but be courteous). If no one else has replied, it is possible other people don't understand the question (or don't have an answer).
Nice Wiki ...