These requests are listed chronologically. They will be addressed in the order they were received.
URL: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/windowsserver
The requests are listed alphabetically by forum and then chronologically by person (first at the top). They include links to the forum threads where the requests were tracked (if applicable).
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/MSWinWebChart/
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/threads
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/biztalkserver
URL: Need to add NOTE: This work is done. Need to include info about it. Spanish:
URL: Need to add NOTE: This work is done. Need to include more info about it.
URL: http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/genuine
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exceldev/threads
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/sharepoint
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbasic/threads
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-AU/category/sqlserver
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-AU/sqlserversamples/threads
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/visualcsharp
URL: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/visualbasic
Richard Mueller edited Revision 48. Comment: Fixed duplicate anchor name tags in HTML so TOC works properly
Bjoern H Rapp edited Revision 33. Comment: Added "Dev Apps 2013" and "2013 Gen"
Richard Mueller edited Revision 26. Comment: Fixed duplicate <a name> tags in HTML so TOC works properly
Richard Mueller edited Revision 19. Comment: Fixed duplicate <a name> tags in HTML so TOC works properly
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 18. Comment: Finished Windows Server
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 15. Comment: Added VB
FZB edited Revision 12. Comment: typo
Nice Wiki Ed,,,
Nice ed, always helpful information
very nice wiki.
True, always helpful.
This is only for US Forums, true?
As I wrote it is helpful, but actually the job is quite unnecessary. Instead of giving away such a job, you could create a bot that automarks long inactive posts as answered (except the OP marks it something like inactive). For example you could fix a time of like 30 days in active mode of the thread, after it gets auto-answered and like 3-6 months for inactive threads.
Anyways, inactive threads could be marked as "inactive" and fall back in the forum list. They would come back up to the top immediatly, if the thread-opener marks it as active again. You could set a minimum inactive time of like 30 days.
And these are just examples.
Robert, no, this can be used for any language forums on MSDN and TechNet. Thanks!
Hemendra Agrawal edited Revision 34. Comment: Updated forum links because it was showing retired and 2013 forum links.