Naomi N edited Revision 7. Comment: Tibor's points
Naomi N edited Revision 4. Comment: Added 2 more points (about my threads and about need for a reason for editing)
Richard Mueller edited Revision 2. Comment: Added three more quirks
Richard Mueller edited Revision 1. Comment: Added comment about metadata, name of op and date more important than number of views.
Naomi N edited Revision 96. Comment: It is hard to keep this article current - may need help
Naomi N edited Revision 97. Comment: More info about adding/removing forums
Naomi N edited Revision 98. Comment: One more request moved
Naomi N edited Revision 99. Comment: Formatting
Naomi N edited Revision 100. Comment: Moved implemented request
Naomi N edited Revision 101. Comment: Standardize
@Real McCoy,
These are some excellent ideas. I suggest you to write a wiki and post.
In general people don't want change as in "reinventing". Recently, this term is being used by Microsoft marketing guys. But unfortunately, they don't want to change their way of conduct.
MSDN blogs, Office blogs, Windows blogs and MSDN forums are the products of Telligent -- an organization owned by ex-softies.. I am sure if members of SharePoint UX team, Mads Kristensen (MSFT), the developer of Web essentials, and John Papa (MSFT) are involved in this reinventing projects for few days (something like stackexchange...beyond the forums).. and they are given free hand. They would render all the Telligent products obsolete. But some people don't want it to happen.
This didn't happen in last decade. I have been following IE-MSDN-blog since 2007 and I can show you that people were complaining about the broken comment system way before that, till date and its not fixed. I know MSFT employees are not responsible for that. They can't do much when it comes to decisions from higher up the food chain.
Anyway, unfortunately this isn't going to happen in future due to some convoluted/corrupt reason. No wonder, Microsoft.. like any other big organization, is the victim of some creepy bureaucracy.
Naomi N edited Revision 103. Comment: Moved implemented request
Naomi N edited Revision 106. Comment: Added See Also
Ed Price - MSFT edited Revision 108. Comment: Moved one suggestion down to fixed: Make an easy way to add / remove forums to 'My Forums' list
Naomi, thousands of people asked for the forums to be redesigned. Many of product teams wanted a design that was more like Stack Overflow or Microsoft Answers/Community. So the Forums team came up with a design that was more suited for people sorting through multiple forums at once (versus dropping in the wrong forum and posting a question there simply because it's "Microsoft").
The forums were tested. Obviously not enough. The team tried to get many more testers, reaching out to specific groups that were set up, but sometimes the communication didn't reach them, and much more often the people who were reached out to didn't quite understand how important it was for them to test (how much it would affect them), so the participation was far lower than it should have been. But the team certainly tried and they did get some good feedback (including an in person session with the MVPs). But obviously it was not nearly the volume of feedback as it is like this, when it is in full production. Now they're getting the volume of feedback that they truly need to prioritize the changes. So they appreciate that they're finally getting it!
If you want my feedback, then, unfortunately for me, the forum's re-design made it impossible for me to participate with the same quality and quantity as before. Nowadays I am not even checking the forums and I used to spend all my time there. I am very sad about it because I really loved to answer. I also noticed that some people stopped posting in the forums since re-design. So, even if most of the problems will be fixed, I don't think we will get the same people returned.
Naomi N edited Revision 110. Comment: Moved toc
Useful info.
Thanks!